Delivery Reliability as Operational Value in Affordable Housing:

A Critical Path Analysis of a Type 36 House Project in Samarinda

Authors

  • Rusliansyah Rusliansyah Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Shine Joynes Palapessy
  • Prapdopo Prapdopo Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Delmiati Politeknik Negeri Samarinda
  • Daira E.M. Sangkilang Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia

Keywords:

affordable housing delivery, critical path method, operational efficiency, project scheduling, lead time reduction

Abstract

Affordable housing competes not only on price but also on dependable handover performance. However, many Critical Path Method (CPM) studies on small housing projects remain framed as technical scheduling exercises and do not clearly show the precedence logic needed for replication. This study examines a Type 36 house project in Samarinda as a case of project-based housing delivery. Using field observation, interviews with the project manager, and project schedule records, the study reconstructs a package-level CPM network with explicit predecessors, forward and backward pass results, slack values, and an accelerated scenario. The documented managerial schedule shows a normal completion horizon of 180 days. Under the accelerated scenario, the elapsed project time can be reduced to 123 days, generating a saving of 57 days or 31.7 percent. The revised CPM presentation shows that the critical structure is concentrated in preparatory work, earthworks, concrete work, wall work, the roof-ceiling sequence, sanitation coordination, and final electrical work, while floor work, frame installation, and locking activities carry limited float. The contribution of the study is threefold. First, it positions schedule control as a delivery-reliability issue in affordable housing operations. Second, it provides a more transparent CPM presentation than many local housing case studies. Third, it offers practical guidance for managers in prioritizing supervision and resource coordination. The study does not measure customer satisfaction directly; therefore, its claim is limited to time-efficiency analysis and delivery-reliability support.

References

Aprillia, S. C., Wasono, & A’yun, Q. Q. (2023). Optimalisasi biaya dan waktu pelaksanaan pembangunan rumah tinggal di Kecamatan Rantau Pulung Kutai Timur menggunakan Critical Path Method (CPM) dan Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT). Basis: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30872/basis.v2i1.1000

Asrul, M. R., Tindaon, M. C. A., Azzahra, D. N., Wulandari, R., & Ismayanti, R. (2025). Project scheduling for swallow nest construction using the critical path method. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 15(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v15i2.2273

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Samarinda. (2025). Kota Samarinda dalam angka 2025.

Basriati, S., & Melda, A. (2017). Analisis biaya pembangunan proyek perumahan menggunakan metode PERT dan EVM (Studi kasus: Perumahan D’Lion Cluster). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi, Komunikasi dan Industri, 642–647.

Bhatt, R., Thakker, R., Sukhadia, O., Kunadia, S., Kumar, A., & Kiran, M. B. (2022). Challenges in the implementation of the critical path method: A review. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Sydney.

Mazlum, M., & Güneri, A. F. (2015). CPM, PERT and project management with fuzzy logic technique and implementation on a business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.378

Perdana, M. A., & Sari, R. P. (2022). Optimalisasi waktu pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi rumah tinggal menggunakan metode CPM (Critical Path Method) dan PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique). Jurnal Media Teknik dan Sistem Industri, 6(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.35194/jmtsi.v6i2.1944

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

Rabbani, R. M., Muhazir, A., & Widyantoro, M. (2024). Penerapan manajemen proyek dengan metode CPM dan PERT pada proyek pembangunan perumahan Permata Nusa Indah. Prosiding Semnastek FT-UBJ, 1(1).

Senior, B. A. (2009). Critical path method implementation drawbacks: A discussion using action theory. Colorado State University / ASC Proceedings.

Surahman, S., Kusumah, A., Tiara, T., Tomby, R. S., & Nurmaulida, N. (2024). Project management planning of the small house construction in Samarinda using the critical path method (CPM). Enrichment: Journal of Management, 14(3), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v14i3.1939

Syaifuddin, D. T. (2011). Riset operasi (Aplikasi quantitative analysis for management). CV Citra Malang.

Trihudiyatmanto, M. (2018). Riset operasional (Operations research) dan penyelesaian menggunakan software WinQSB. Penerbit NEM.

Wardani, N. M. E., Musdalifah, S., & Lusiyanti, D. (2018). Optimalisasi biaya dan waktu pelaksanaan proyek pembangunan perumahan Citraland Palu menggunakan metode Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)–Critical Path Method (CPM). Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Terapan, 15(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.22487/2540766X.2018.V15.I2.11353

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Rusliansyah, R., Palapessy, S. J., Prapdopo, P., Delmiati, & Sangkilang, D. E. (2026). Delivery Reliability as Operational Value in Affordable Housing: : A Critical Path Analysis of a Type 36 House Project in Samarinda. Marketing Innovation Journal (MIJ), 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://ojs.polnes.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/190